Ryan Dickerson vs Garrett Johns Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Johns has demonstrated a slight edge, winning 43.86% of these points, compared to Dickerson's 41.56%. Such metrics often provide significant insights into the potential outcomes of a match. In terms of return game statistics, recent performances indicate that Dickerson surpasses Johns slightly in winning points on their opponent's second serve, with percentages standing at 47.35% and 45.72%, respectively. When it comes to first serve returns, Dickerson maintains a lead with a 27.27% success rate over Johns’ 24.76%, which is pivotal in head-to-head matchups.

In high-pressure scenarios, encapsulated by the ability to save breakpoints, Dickerson edges out with a 53.66% success rate against Johns' 52.06%. Over the last year, Johns has maintained a better match win percentage of 63.75% (W/L 51/29), compared to Dickerson's 61.54% (W/L 32/20), giving a comprehensive picture of their head-to-head potential. A surface analysis reveals that Johns thrives on hard surfaces, winning 66% of matches, contrasting sharply with a meager 33% on indoor hard, while Clay is Dickerson's forte with a 61% win rate and has yet to register a win on indoor hard courts.

When evaluating player level, Johns has excelled in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, showcasing a 74.47% win rate (W/L 35/12), whereas Dickerson matches this with a 61.54% success rate on the same circuit. The caliber of opponents also plays a critical role; Johns has faced less formidable competition, with an average rank of 431.35, unlike Dickerson's tougher opponents, averaging rank 282.12. In deciding sets, Johns shows superior resilience, winning 67% of such match conclusions over the past year, while Dickerson lags with 39% victories in similar circumstances.

Considering break point conversion in recent times, both players show similar efficiency, with Johns converting 30.56% and Dickerson 30.43% of opportunities, a crucial statistic for in-game live betting. Despite these close stats, Johns’s consistency and edge in crucial match-deciding elements, coupled with a stronger historical win rate on favored surfaces, suggest that they are likely to emerge as the victor in this particular matchup.